It must be of concern when segments of the national media frequently distort and misrepresent scientific articles and scientists' statements in complete departure from accepted standards of journalistic honesty and decency.

The entire article is well worth a read, mainly for bravely highlighting the media's obsession with a distorted sense of "balance" in the climate change "debate". Balance in this case would be 9 minutes (or blog articles) of pro-anthropogenic climate change reporting for every 1 minute of anti-anthropogenic climate change reporting (and making sure that the anti-argument was made by respected climate scientists, rather than kooks).